SCPs,
I regret that I have been put in the position where I must apologise for the
invasion of your privacy through a number of unsolicited e-mails.
It is difficult to find the right balance between having access to sub-community
presidents via their official e-mail addresses and being able to curtail the
excesses of those who have their own agendas - and I wish that I had the answer.
In the current situation, there is a difference between the promotion of an
opposing point of view.....and sending a stream of unsolicited e-mails which simply
end up by being counter productive as most recipients get so annoyed with them
that the e-mails are rightly consigned to the bin.
Indeed, one of our S-C Ps has become so disenchanted by these unwanted e-mails
that, regrettably, he/she has resigned.
Nigel
We really do need to correct this miss-information within the community.
Firstly, the notice of a meeting of owners has to be officially called by
Resortalia and placing it in a low level communication just will not do.
If someone has an alternative viewpoint from the
Committee, then it is incorrect that their alternative
views "should be rightly consigned to the bin" as
Nigel directs.
Also when each SCP was elected they clearly signed data protection forms
for the use of the SCP email accounts to be used and as such any email
sent to the SCP email address to do with the community is not
"unsolicited". If individual SCP's do not want to receive correspondence
on key owner issues then they really are in the wrong roles and need to
resign.
In terms of the latest saga then Pedro is the gardening
subject matter expert as he designed a number of PW resorts and the
committee would be wise to work with locals rather than constantly
against them. As I recall the same fundamental mistakes arose with the
sub community cleaning contracts where we were constantly told they
could not be performed any cheaper. A local supplier subsequently
reduced the costs by 70%.
In closing, surely artificial grass would be a compromise to the PW
strips, an idea raised by a number of owners two years ago but that was
from an owner not on the committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment